China calls out Uniqlo’s ‘lying’ mirrors

What happened The hashtag “Uniqlo mirror” soared to the top of Weibo’s Hot Search yesterday, thanks to a fierce debate over whether the Japanese retailer’s in-store fitting room mirrors are subtly enhanced. A surge of netizens accused the brand of using “filter-like” mirrors that make customers appear slimmer, taller, or more radiant — only for those illusions to vanish once they return home. Others argued that the discrepancy could stem from ambient lighting, not the mirrors themselves. Social media erupts over shopping illusions “Every time I buy clothes in the store, I always feel they look amazing — but once I get home and look in my own mirror, it’s a completely different story,” Weibo user YigexinyuanJJY (@祎个心愿jjy) quipped. @Sillylittlemushroom (@憨憨的一朵菌子) wrote, “Are we sure these are mirrors and not magic portals?” And SlowToReactYingJiu (@反射弧超长星人影九) posted, “So, we’ve all moved on from the Xinjiang cotton issue? Now we’re back to loving Uniqlo’s mirrors?” In response, a Uniqlo store representative told local media that all mirrors are standard vertical flat mirrors, with no visual-enhancement features. However, the topic has gained traction due to a broader perception that many fashion retailers install flattering mirrors and carefully calibrated lighting. According to Chinese media outlet Health Times, mirrors tilted between 65° and 75° can visually elongate legs, while subtly concave mirrors may create a slimming effect. These optical illusions, paired with soft ambient lighting, can significantly alter how garments, and people, appear. The Jing Take The Uniqlo mirror controversy is more than a viral quirk — it’s a window into evolving consumer expectations around transparency, trust, and body image. In an era when beauty filters dominate online culture, shoppers are growing wary of similar effects bleeding into physical retail spaces. While Uniqlo maintains its mirrors are standard, the backlash points to a deeper skepticism: whether brands are subtly nudging consumers toward purchases by distorting their reflection. When reflection meets reality: The consumer awakening Posts like “this isn’t just about mirrors, it’s about how we’re sold an illusion,” and, “30% of my wardrobe is thanks to those mirrors lying to me,” reveal mounting frustration among young consumers who feel misled. Some even see it as a form of soft deception — one that straddles the line between savvy marketing and ethical gray zone. Although there are no regulations in China explicitly prohibiting “visual enhancement” in store design, the psychological fallout, particularly among image-conscious youth, is increasingly under scrutiny. For brands like Uniqlo, the challenge lies in maintaining an appealing in-store experience without crossing over into manipulation. The Jing Take reports on a piece of the leading news and presents our editorial team’s analysis of the key implications for the luxury industry. In the recurring column, we analyze everything from product drops and mergers to heated debate sprouting on Chinese social media.

China calls out Uniqlo’s ‘lying’ mirrors

On this page

Published June 17, 2025

Sectors

Insights

Company

China calls out Uniqlo’s ‘lying’ mirrors