China’s luxury shoppers buy with feeling. Their AI agents don’t

This year, around 1 million brands will compete for attention on Tmall during China’s Singles’ Day shopping festival. Many of the shoppers they are courting, however, will arrive with help. Since May 2026, Alibaba has connected its AI assistant Qwen to Taobao and Tmall, where it can search more than 4 billion products, compare options in conversation, and complete purchases. In a single week in February 2026, Alipay processed over 120 million payments made by AI agents. ByteDance is testing in-app ordering through its Doubao assistant, while Tencent is building AI agents into WeChat. At the same time, China’s young consumers are spending with their hearts. They talk about emotional value. They spend on products that offer comfort, luck, or reflect who they want to become. Logos matter less than they did five years ago. Meaning matters more. Put those two developments side by side, and the challenge for luxury becomes hard to ignore. Some of the most emotional buyers in the world now shop through some of the most rational gatekeepers ever built. The client decides with their heart. The agent decides what the client gets to see. This should worry every brand that has relied on the moment of contact to create desire. For decades, luxury could rescue a weak story inside the store. An advisor could connect an object to the client’s life, while a window display sparked curiosity. A beautiful space could do the emotional work the brand had left undone. An AI agent skips that entire process. It does not touch the leather, and it leaves no hesitation for a good advisor to answer. It reads, compares, and chooses before a brand has a chance to speak. What Van Cleef’s Alhambra teaches AI about desire What does an agent do with a category where every brand describes itself in the same way? It does what any analyst would do. It puts the lookalikes side by side and reduces them to what can be counted, which means features and price. Desire drops out of the equation, and the premium goes with it. A brand that cannot be told apart from three others becomes a line item, and a line item during Singles’ Day is a discount waiting to happen. The paradox is that China’s luxury clients already show the way out. Van Cleef & Arpels’ Alhambra clover has become one of the most recognized symbols of luck and status in China’s jewelry market. A gold four-leaf clover is easy to find for a fraction of the price. Few people who want an Alhambra would settle for one of those, because the meaning lives in the luck it promises and the recognition it earns. Desire of that kind defeats comparison. An agent being asked about an Alhambra has no reason to search for something similar. There is nothing left for it to decide. That is the position every luxury brand should aim for with the machines now standing between it and its clients. An agent can be a ruthless filter, but it can also be a remarkably effective matchmaker because it knows what its user values and which moments matter in that person’s life. When a brand is clear about what it means, the agent can connect that meaning to the right person, including clients the brand might not otherwise reach through a store or campaign. A platform can bury a product. It cannot bury a brand people ask for by name. Can your brand survive AI gatekeepers? My estimate is that 30% to 50% of today’s luxury brands will not make this transition without drastic change. Many of the brands most at risk have excellent craft. Their weakness is a story that stops at the object and a habit of treating desire as a soft cost, the first budget line to go when sales slow. In a market where machines make the first selection, cutting desire means cutting the reason to be chosen. Some leaders will hope that technology can write the missing story for them. Asking AI for a brand’s meaning pulls it toward the average of everything that already exists, and average is exactly what an agent filters out. Meaning that survives a machine has to come from people who are willing to take a position and defend it. Much of the evidence an agent trusts comes from clients. It learns about a brand from what people write after a purchase and from how they describe the way it made them feel. A promise that clients do not recognize in their own experience will not survive that reading, no matter how beautiful the advertising around it. This transformation was the subject of a recent episode of The Future of Luxury Podcast, and China makes the argument sharper than any other market. The country that showed luxury how fast digital discovery could move is now showing how fast the gatekeepers can change. What is happening in Hangzhou and Shenzhen this year will reach Paris and New York sooner than most boardrooms expect. The question for every leadership team is simple. When clients anywhere in the world ask their agents for something that feels like them, does your brand mean enough to be the answer? This is an opinion piece by Daniel Langer, CEO of luxury brand strategy firm Équité and Executive Professor of Luxury Strategy at Pepperdine University and NYU.

China’s luxury shoppers buy with feeling. Their AI agents don’t

TUMI’s new growth playbook: From travel expertise to lifestyle performance

Upgrade to Pro

Sectors

Insights

Company

China’s luxury shoppers buy with feeling. Their AI agents don’t

TUMI’s new growth playbook: From travel expertise to lifestyle performance