Key Takeaways:#
- Recent cancellatons and arrests indicate that Beijing regulators are far from done with their crackdown on the entertainment sector.
- Brands need to keep a close eye on the ongoing tech crackdown, which could have a huge impact on their marketing activities in 2022.
- With the National Congress a little under a year away, the year ahead is likely to be complicated for foreign and domestic brands alike.
In many ways, 2021 has been the year of the crackdown in China, with everyone from tech giants and the gaming industry to global fast-fashion brands, domestic celebrities, and even the fans of those celebrities in Beijing’s regulatory crosshairs. And although luxury brands have so far been spared the kind of lifestyle clampdown they faced in China circa 2013, there are indications that two lingering concerns -- the celebrity and tech crackdowns -- could become even more complex in 2022.
Although not on the level of recent celebrity scandals such as Kris Wu’s detainment or Zheng Shuang’s massive tax bill, the recent arrest and public humiliation of “Piano Prince” Li Yundi indicates that Beijing is serious about its ramped-up regulation of the entertainment sector. But it also reiterates the role of the tech sector within the celebrity crackdown, as major internet platforms such Weibo, Tencent Video, and Douyin pledged this year to essentially blacklist stars deemed by the central government to be controversial. This means any celebrity who has even the slightest whiff of scandal or controversy around them going into 2022 is unlikely to be rehabilitated any time soon (if ever). This means it is more important than ever for luxury brands to be extra careful in the spokespeople they hire as the face of their brand over the next year in China.
But perhaps the most concerning crackdown for luxury brands could very well be in China’s tech industry, which was the first to fall afoul of Beijing regulators last November. Specifically, the concern for major brands should be the rising strength of massive government regulatory agencies in China in the run-up to next year’s National Congress. Digitally savvy brands have likely become very familiar with agencies like the Cyberspace Administration of China (CAC), which over the past year has issued a series of policies designed to curb overt displays of extravagant lifestyles through measures such as blacklisting and content filtering. Another powerful agency, the National Radio and Television Administration (NRTA), has worked closely with the CAC in 2021 to tighten their grip on what can be shown on television or streaming platforms and -- perhaps more importantly -- who can be shown doing it.
But another agency that has become a powerful and influential force is the State Administration of Market Regulation (SAMR), which was formed three years ago as an amalgamation of existing agencies. Having made international headlines via its massive fines on tech giants like Alibaba, SAMR is now very much on the warpath with a particular focus on antitrust regulation. This month, Reuters noted that China may upgrade the SAMR’s antitrust bureau to deputy-ministerial status under a new name, the National Antimonopoly Bureau, and give it a slew of new powers. For example, the Bureau would theoretically be able to obtain significantly more resources to investigate mergers and acquisitions, potentially causing issues with international companies looking to invest in domestic Chinese brands, designers, or retailers.
But most importantly, the activities of the SAMR and the beefed-up antimonopoly regulators will impact brands’ strategic approach to social media (and social selling) and e-commerce in China. Where just a year or two ago an e-commerce strategy for China was relatively simple -- often boiled down to choosing a platform like Tmall Luxury Pavilion or JD.com -- the SAMR’s trust-busting activities have already changed the game. The SAMR started off 2021 by sticking Alibaba and Meituan with huge fines for their established “choose one from two (er xuan yi, 二选一)” practices, which essentially forced merchants to exclusively opt for their platform. Since, other bureaucratic juggernauts like the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (MIIT) also laid down the law, ordering domestic tech giants to demolish their “walled gardens,” which notoriously banned in-app links to competitive platforms.
What all of this means is that 2022 is likely to be a complex year for luxury in China, as regulatory pressures compound and agencies flex their muscles. While, at the moment, there is no indication that the government will specifically target international brands or “luxury lifestyles,” beyond the current vague crackdown on “wealth-flaunting,” the platforms that brands have come to rely on for marketing and e-commerce are under possibly greater-than-ever pressure. As such, it is critical to avoid putting all of one’s eggs in one (tech) basket and developing a thought-out contingency plan well in advance in the event antitrust regulators intensify the crackdown on e-commerce, streaming video, or social platforms in 2022.