China Shutters Harper’s Bazaar and 24 Other Accounts on WeChat

In the latest instance in a series of crackdowns on the media, China’s internet regulators have called for the closing of 60 social media accounts. The country’s biggest internet companies, including Baidu, Tencent, Youku and NetEase were ordered to shut down accounts that offered celebrity news and gossip because they undermined socialist values.

As a result of a meeting on June 7 with the Beijing Cyberspace Administration, WeChat has taken down 25 public accounts, including those of several fashion magazines such as the Hearst-owned Harper’s Bazaar and its Chinese domestic counterpart Southern Metropolis Entertainment.

A post on the Beijing Cyberspace Administration’s Weibo account detailing the meeting said that websites should “take effective measures to contain the glorification of scandals and the private lives of celebrities, the sensationalization of their conspicuous consumption and low taste.”

In moving to control sites that disseminate information about celebrities, the cyberspace authorities said, in a post on its official Weibo account on June 8, that the aim of their move was to “actively propagate core values of socialism, and create a healthy and positive online environment.”

Followers of the closed account will receive the above notification when they click on the previous posts.

Followers of the closed account will receive the above notification when they click on the previous posts.

On WeChat, followers of those disabled accounts have found that they can no longer access previous posts. When clicking on any article in the ‘View History’ section of an individual follower’s account (which archives older stories), followers are directed to a page that reads, “This account has been shut down due to its failure to follow internet regulations.”

Along with the internationally renowned fashion magazine Harper’s Bazaar, 24 other accounts on the super popular social media site WeChat were disabled. The magazine quickly responded by opening a new public account named “Bazaar Entertainment’s New Account.”

The greeting message of Harper Bazaar new public account.

The greeting message of Harper’s Bazaar’s new public account.

When they follow Harper’s Bazaar’s new account, WeChat users will see a message that says:

Thank you all for your long time support of Bazaar Entertainment. Due to reasons beyond our control, the public account will go through a transformation in the near future. We are sorry for any inconvenience this might have caused, and thank you for your understanding and support!

On Weibo, oddly, Harper Bazaar’s account continues to be live even though the two platforms have pushed out highly similar content in the past. On that platform, the fashion magazine mostly focuses on reporting celebrity collaborations with fashion and luxury brands as well as their attendance at exclusive events like the Cannes Film Festival and the Met Gala.

The different handling of the account on the two platforms could be related to their openness. Accounts on WeChat, which is primarily a messaging service, are less public than others like Weibo. On Weibo you can see posts of just about anyone else and forward them to others. On WeChat, however, you have to be a subscriber to a public account to view its posts.

The action taken by the Cyberspace Administration has received mixed reviews from Chinese WeChat users. Some supporters praise the crackdown saying that “paparazzi accounts” reflect the most depraved element of society and show no respect for people’s basic rights.

Followers of the closed accounts, however, were angry and voiced concern for what the crackdown on independent media means for freedom of expression in China. “Why are you shutting down this one?” one WeChat user, “Detective Wang,” wrote about a film account in the comment section of an article that lists all of the shuttered sites. “Is no alternative voice allowed anymore? “

Categories

Policy, Social Media

  • Jaycasey

    Not only is this a freedom of information issue it is also an unfair trade barrier for foreign companies who are leaders in the entertainment space. Meanwhile, Chinese “information” providers such as Global Times have free and open access to foreign markets, including the US and Europe.

Error: Please enter a valid email address

Error: Invalid email

Error: Please enter your first name

Error: Please enter your last name

Error: Please enter a username

Error: Please enter a password

Error: Please confirm your password

Error: Password and password confirmation do not match